|
Op-Ed to the Alexandria Gazette Packet re: Edward Bell |
|
Letter: State-Approved
Killings
Thursday,
March 05, 2009
To the
Editor:
On Thursday, Feb. 19, Virginia killed Edward Nathaniel Bell in our
name. He received the death penalty because he was found guilty for the 1999
murder of Officer Ricky Timbrook in Winchester. Officer Timbrook’s murder is a
heinous crime and his murderer deserves severe punishment. However, killing a
person who has killed another person to make the point that killing a person is
wrong is absolute nonsense. Our humanity is diminished when the commonwealth
kills in our name. Make no mistake: state approved killing is still killing,
despite the fact that we name it execution to sweeten it up.
I certainly
don’t know whether Eddie Bell killed Officer Timbrook. He claims he did not,
including his last words as he was forcibly carried to the execution chamber. I
do know that Eddie Bell was most likely retarded (the Supreme Court has ruled
that mentally retarded people cannot be executed), but was prevented from
presenting that evidence at his trial. His legal counsel in the sentencing phase
was so poor that the appeal court commented on the absolute failure of counsel
to provide any mitigating information. The case against Eddie Bell was
completely circumstantial, and the only witness against him has admitted to
lying in his testimony. These irregularities make it possible that Virginia has killed an
innocent man in my name.
Over 130 death row inmates have been exonerated
by the Innocence project, which has proved that they did not commit the crimes
for which they were found guilty. Unless and until we have a fool-proof legal
system, incapable of error, I do not want any state-approved killing carried out
in my name. How about you? Please let the governor and your state legislators
know how you feel.
DeeDee
Tostanoski
|