|
|
Tessa Van Hart, a pizza delivery woman, was
sodomized and
murdered while making a delivery outside of The Supreme Court of Virginia consolidated Cherrix's appeal
with its
proportionality review. The court summarily dismissed a number of
Cherrix's
claims and labeled its discussion of them as "Issues Previously
Decided." These arguments were based upon the general constitutionality
of
the The court's discussion of Cherrix's Brady claim is noteworthy
for its
implications to defense counsel. Cherrix's grandmother testified as an
alibi
witness for him at trial. The Commonwealth introduced a written
statement,
signed by Cherrix's grandmother, containing essentially the same
information as
her trial testimony, albeit with a fifteen-minute time discrepancy.
Presumably,
the statement was offered to impeach Cherrix's grandmother. The defense
objected to the admission of the statement since it contained
exculpatory
information that had not been disclosed by the Commonwealth, in
violation of
Brady v. However, defense counsel's anticipated access to material held
by the
Commonwealth is irrelevant when evaluating a Brady claim. Thus, the
Commonwealth's duty to disclose is in danger of becoming defense
counsel's duty
to discover. The Supreme Court of Virginia rejected all of Cherrix's
claims and
upheld his death sentence on In January 2001, Federal District Court Judge Gerald Bruce Lee
ordered the
state to turn over seminal fluid taken from Van Hart’s body for further
DNA
testing. The evidence was tested at the time of the crime, but
more
precise tests are available today. The Fourth Circuit issued an
emergency
stay on Brian Lee Cherrix was executed by the Commonwealth of
Virginia on March 18, 2004. |
|
Va. death penalty info | Execution info | 21-day rule Join VADP |