Michael Lenz

Michael Lenz was born on February 27, 1964, in San Diego, California.  He and his family moved to northern Virginia after his fourth grade.  Although Lenz never completed high school, he received his GED when he was 17 years old.  After several run-ins with the law, he returned to northern Virginia, where he camped outdoors and committed burglaries to support his drug habit and other needs.  He was arrested and charged for these burglaries, and was sentenced to spend time in the Augusta Correctional Center

On January 16, 2000 while an inmate at this facility, Lenz along with Jeffrey Remington, stabbed a fellow prisoner, Brent Parker, to death.  At trial, Lenz testified that the slaying was religiously motivated.  The Augusta County Circuit Court jury deliberated for about an hour before sentencing Michael Lenz to death for his role in Parker’s murder. Jeffrey Remington also sentenced to death, was on Virginia’s Death Row until his suicide in February of 2004.

On March 5, 2004 the Virginia Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to deny Lenz’s appeal for a new sentencing hearing despite the Virginia Supreme Court’s ruling in Atkins vs. Commonwealth, that it is vital to the defendant in a criminal case that the jury have a proper verdict form. Lenz’s case, however, occurred before the Atkins’ decision, and the majority decreed that the ruling was thus not pertinent to Lenz’s claims. 

In addition Lenz’s counsel in a series of appeals argued that they were rendered ineffective by the distance and manner in which they were allowed to consult with their client. Following the murder, Lenz was initially transferred to a super-max prison 250 miles away from the Augusta Correctional Center. Because the ineffective counsel claim was filed on direct appeal rather than through a writ of habeas corpus it was denied as procedurally defective, not because it was unfounded. Human beings should not face executions as a result of procedural errors.

Michael Lenz has been issued an execution date of July 27, 2006.

On July 11, the Virginia Capital Representation Resource Center submitted a clemency petition to Governor Timothy Kaine on behalf of Michael W. Lenz, who is scheduled to be executed on July 27, 2006.  Lenz and his co-defendant, Jeffrey Remington, were convicted of killing Brent Parker, another inmate in the Augusta Correctional Center, during a meeting of the Ironwood Kindred, a group of inmates who practiced the Asatru religion.  The Governor has been urged to consider the following facts about the case and to commute Michael’s sentence to life in prison.

 

Improper and Misleading Verdict Forms Were Given to the Jury.

 

There is no dispute that the penalty phase verdict forms that were supplied to Michael’s jury failed to include all of the lawful sentencing options and could never be used in a capital murder trial today.  The forms given to Michael’s jury had two critical flaws:  first, they failed to provide the jury with the ability to find one or both aggravating circumstances and still sentence Michael to life (as they are permitted to do under the law); second, they failed to provide the jury with the ability to sentence Lenz to one of the three sentencing options for capital murder – life imprisonment plus a fine of up to $100,000.

 

            The Supreme Court of Virginia recently reversed a death sentence in Morrisette v. Commonwealth, 613 S.E.2d 551 (Va. 2005), based upon one of the precise errors that occurred in Michael’s case.  In Morrisette, the court found that the defendant’s right to the effective assistance of counsel was violated when his trial attorneys failed to object to verdict forms that were materially identical to those used in Michael’s case.  The same court had rejected Lenz’s identical claim by a 4-3 vote.  The only difference was that Lenz’s trial occurred on July 26-27, 2000, before the Supreme Court of Virginia’s decision in Powell v. Commonwealth, 552 S.E.2d 344 (Va. 2001), and Morrisette’s trial occurred on August 13-15, 2001, two months after Powell was decided.  It was in Powell that the Supreme Court of Virginia first explicitly addressed one of the two problems that existed with Michael’s verdict forms.  The Governor should intervene to ensure that the year and seventeen days that passed between Michael’s trial and Morrisette’s is not the arbitrary difference between life and death.

           

If Lenz is executed on July 27, 2006, he will be executed pursuant to a sentence that was imposed by a jury that did not have all of its sentencing options before it.

 

Lenz’s jury was deprived of critical information

that would have counseled in favor of a life sentence.

 

After a troubled childhood and adolescence, Michael found himself homeless and destitute, living out of a tent in the woods of Prince William County.  In order to support himself, he broke into three residences and a restaurant to steal food during this time.  He was convicted of burglary and possession of a firearm in October 1993 and sentenced to 29 years and 90 days.  He was sent to Augusta Correctional Center.  

 

According to prison records, Michael was not considered a problem inmate at Augusta.  While incarcerated, Michael was introduced to the Asatru religion and helped form the Ironwood Kindred.  The Asatru religion revives ancient Norse religious practices of the Viking Age, which pre-dated Judeo-Christian beliefs.  The term “Asatru” translates to “belief in the Gods.”  Asatru is an officially recognized religion by the governments of Iceland, Denmark, and Norway.

 

The victim in this case, Brent Parker, was a convicted murderer serving a 50-year sentence for the brutal 1985 murder of Ralph “Jimmy” Jenkins in Winchester, Virginia.  The crime occurred in a trailer park, where Parker, for seemingly no reason, parked the car that he and Jenkins were riding in together and suddenly attacked Jenkins.  By all accounts Jenkins was highly intoxicated and incapable of defending himself and just kept asking Parker “why are you hitting me?”  An eyewitness to the crime testified that there was no provocation by Jenkins, and that Parker was laughing and taking smoke and drink breaks during the hour-long beating.  At one point during the killing, Parker lifted Jenkins’ pants into the air and showed them to onlookers, stating “I kicked his ass until I kicked him out of his pants.”  At Parker’s trial witnesses testified that the only thing Jenkins was able to do while being attacked was “put[] his hands over his head trying to keep any of [the blows] from connecting.”  Witnesses testified that Parker also balanced himself on one foot on top of Jenkins’ head and yelled to his friends that he could balance himself on Jenkins’ ear.  Parker later bragged that before leaving the scene of the murder he backed over Jenkins with his car.  Parker left Jenkins for dead and drove to a nearby 7-11 with his friends where he proceeded to terrorize the young female clerk for two hours.  The clerk stated that Parker was covered in blood from his knees down and that his car also had blood on it.  Parker bragged to the clerk about how he “jumped up and down on [Jenkins’] head until he popped it,” and demonstrated this for her as he laughed.  Parker then stole beer and cigarettes from the clerk, who stated “I wasn’t going to try and stop him after what he just told me.”  Parker also made sexual advances towards her for the two hours he spent in the store that night.

 

In prison, Parker continued to be aggressive toward other inmates and even correctional officers.  During Parker’s murder trial, Officer John Bryant was called to testify about threats Parker had made to him in the jail.  Bryant testified that “[Parker] looked at my head and [Parker] said my head would pop just like [Jenkins’] did.”  Other inmates described Parker as someone who “provoked other inmates regularly . . . [and] would pick at them verbally and try to intimidate inmates with threats.”  One of the inmates that Parker like to threaten was Michael Lenz.  Parker twice told Lenz that he would “sharpen the point of his cane and stab [Michael] through [the] heart with it.”  Lenz had good reason to take these threats seriously; Parker boasted about the fact that he was a convicted murderer, reminding Lenz “I am a killer.”  According to another inmate, Parker also made a point of “telling people that he was considering hurting Michael.”  Parker also threatened to kill Lenz’s closest friend, Jeffrey Remington.  Parker summoned Remington to Parker’s cell and, while another inmate trapped Remington by blocking the cell door, threatened to kill him.  Parker later threatened to kill Remington again in a separate incident.

 

During a religious ceremony in January of 2000, Michael and Remington stabbed Brent Parker to death in front of a room full of inmates. 

 

At trial, the prosecutor argued that Lenz and Remington viciously attacked Brent Parker and had “no excuse” for doing so.  The prosecutor repeatedly described Brent Parker as “helpless” and “defenseless,” and claimed that Parker “did nothing wrong.”  The jury that sentenced Lenz to death did not hear any of the details about Brent Parker’s brutal killing of Jimmy Jenkins, or even that Parker was in prison for murder.  Lenz’s jury never knew that he bragged about the man he had killed and threatened inmates and guards alike.  Although the jury knew that Parker threatened to stab Lenz with the sharpened end of his cane, they had no way of knowing how serious those threats were.  The jury also never heard about Parker’s repeated threats to kill Lenz’s closest friend, Jeff Remington.

 

None of this information excuses Lenz’s uncharacteristically violent act on January 16, 2000.  Nor is it meant to suggest that Brent Parker deserved to be stabbed 68 times.  Lenz acknowledged at his trial that what he did was wrong.  However, this information is highly relevant to explaining Lenz’s actions.  Certainly, the jury that was charged with deciding whether Michael lived or died should have been informed about the disturbing chain of events that culminated with Michael’s killing of Brent Parker.  In his clemency petition, Michael has asked the Governor to consider the fact that this violent incident was highly aberrational and was based upon extreme provocation by an extraordinarily dangerous and aggressive inmate.

 

James Aiken, an expert on inmate classification and prison management, has reviewed Michael Lenz’s case extensively and submitted an affidavit in 2002.  Mr. Aiken concluded that despite that fact that Michael had killed another inmate, he did not reflect the pattern of a prison predator and there was “not a probability that Mr. Lenz would commit criminal acts of violence” in prison.  Aiken based this conclusion on several factors:  (1) Michael’s non-violent criminal history; (2) Michael’s social history; (3) the fact that Michael had previously “interacted with prison officials when he has encountered conflicts, rather than resorting to violence….Lenz is not an individual that systematically uses criminal means and violence to resolve issues;” (4) the absence of any gang involvement; (5) Michael’s respect for authority, which was noted even during the commission of this offense; and (6) Michael’s age.  In addition, Mr. Aiken noted that Michael would be housed in more secure facilities and would never be placed in similar circumstances to those that preceded the killing of Brent Parker.

 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

Jurors consulted a Bible during penalty phase deliberations.

 

In a petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, Michael seeks a new sentencing hearing based upon the fact that the jurors in his case consulted a Bible during penalty deliberations.  Remarkably, the Supreme Court of Virginia held that Michael had not proved that the jurors consulted the Bible “about the matter pending before the jury,” even though uncontradicted testimony showed that when one juror asked whether the Bible addresses the appropriate punishment for murder, another juror responded that the Bible answers that question, several jurors then referred to unspecified chapters or verses of the Bible, and one juror later recalled that the referenced Bible passages indicated that death is the appropriate punishment for murder.



Home | News & updates | Action alerts | Vigil info | Upcoming events | The Row
Va. death penalty info | Execution info | 21-day rule
Join VADP | Search