|
Fall/Winter 1999
Be sure to mark your brand new calendars
Join us with our special guest, Sr. Helen Prejean
(author of Dead Man
Walking) on Thursday January 27 at 11 AM at the
Capitol for Virginia
Death Penalty Awareness Day. Every year
we gather in Richmond to inform
our legislator’s that Virginians support an alternative
to the death
penalty. Last year 15 VADP members were
recognized in the gallery of
the House of Delegates. The gallery seats
100. Join Sr. Helen in
“Filling the Gallery”.
Message from the Director
The scheduled execution of Andre Graham will
mark another milestone in Virginia executions. This will be the 14th
execution of 1999, surpassing last year's record 13, which surpassed the
previous year's record of nine, which surpassed the previous year's record
of eight. (Graham's execution is set for December 9; Virginia's annual
commemoration of International Human Right's Day is on December 10.)
And that number would have been higher if not for 11th hour stays by the
U. S. and Virginia State Supreme Courts for seven others, and the governor
commuting the death sentence of Calvin Swann.
The other bad news is that 8 others have
inhabited those empty cells
this year. And 8 other families will be
victimized by the state.
While it is demoralizing that our Commonwealth
feels the need to kill
so many people, we should be proud of the efforts
that we have made to
keep the death penalty out there in view.
We may have gotten our
biggest boost earlier this year, when the Capital
Case Bill of Review-
the bill to eliminate Virginia’s archaic 21-
Day Rule passed in
committee and was sent to the House of Delegates
for a floor vote, only
to be defeated by 5 votes. We may have
lost a round, but the fight is
far from over. Now, there is not one Virginia
legislator who doesn’t
know about the 21- Day Rule. And furthermore,
since that vote, a number
of legislator’s have reconsidered and would now
vote for the bill. Much
of this can be attributed to each and every one
of you who have
ceaselessly brought the issue up to your legislator.
In April a group formed in Charlottesville
to hold noontime protests on
the day of the 4 executions that occurred, as
well as the one that was
stayed. This received much media coverage
in the area. Another group
came together this year during the noontime hour
on days of executions
in Richmond to protest, and nearly 20 vigils
are now being held across
the state. Over 100 people held vigil outside
the prison on November 9
when Thomas Royal, Jr. was executed in the 2nd
annual, “Fill the Field”
vigil. A number of other faith, student,
civic, and other groups have
held seminars, discussions, and have invited
speaker’s to publicize the
issue. A faith- based group now meets regularly
in Richmond and has
been instrumental in carrying out a number of
events as well as
initiating contact with other groups of faith.
Once again for the 7th consecutive year,
the Virginia Tech Survey shows
support for the death penalty is cut in half
when Virginians are given
an alternative.
Two state groups of legal professionals
have passed resolutions calling
for a moratorium on executions. At least
two faith groups have passed a
similar resolution and others are in the process.
Representatives of at
least 2 city council’s have been approached with
one showing interest.
Our Board of Director’s recently approved
the formation of committees
to specifically address issues for people of
faith, legal professionals,
medical professionals, educators, and others.
And who can ever forget our first award’s
banquet in May.
We continue and continue to grow.
Nearly 3,000 people now receive our
newsletter. Our web site receives 350-400
hits a week. We continue to
field calls from the media, lawyers, students,
and the general public
for information as well as assist those who want
to bring an event to
their community.
So while we deal with many defeats, we should
be proud of our
accomplishments. Let us stay strong and
united as we continue the
fight.
Wishing you all good health during this holiday
season and the coming
new year.
Henry
In memory of those whose lives were taken by the
state of Virginia in
1999:
Mark Sheppard, Tony Fry, George Quisenberry,
David Fisher, Carl
Chichester, Arthur Jenkins, Eric Payne, Ronnie
Yeatts, Tommy Strickler,
Dewayne Williams, Everett Mueller, Jason Joseph,
and Thomas Royal, Jr.
Upcoming Executions
December 9- Andre Graham, Jan. 10- Chris Thomas,
Jan. 13- Steve Roach
Andre Graham was 24 when he entered Death Row
in November of 1994. He
was sentenced to death for the murder of Sheryl
Stack outside a
restaurant in Richmond on October 8, 1993.
Andre contends that it was
his accomplice, Mark Sheppard who did the shooting.
Sheppard was
executed earlier this year for another murder.
Both Chris Thomas and Steve Roach received stays
from the Virginia
Supreme Court earlier this year because of a
decision the Court had made
that state law requires juvenile courts to notify
both parents when a
juvenile is charged as an adult. Last month
Virginia’s High Court ruled
that they did receive all the notice that state
law requires.
Chris, now 26, was 17 when he was condemned to
die for the 1990 murder
of his girl-friend’s parents, Kathy and James
Wiseman, in Middlesex
County. He contends that it was his girl
friend who shot her mother.
State law makes it a capital offense if more
than one person was
murdered.
Steve, now 23, was 17 when he was condemned to
death for the 1993 murder
of his 70- year old neighbor, Mary Ann Hughes
in Greene County. His
jury recommended the death penalty based on “future
dangerousness”.
Between May and August of 1993, he was convicted
of two auto thefts,
stealing a pistol, and a parole violation.
In an opinion last year, Chief Judge Wilson indicated
that he was,
“uncomfortable” with the prospect of the execution
of a person with such
a light history of criminal behavior.
Every major international human rights treaty
expressly prohibits
executing people for crimes committed before
the age of 18. Since 1990,
only Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudia Arabia, Yemen,
Iran, and the U.S. have
executed juveniles.
Please contact Gov. Gilmore with your concerns.
Gov. James Gilmore, PO Box 1475, Richmond, 23212.
Phone (804) 786-2211,
Fax (8040 786-3985, www.state.va.us/governor/govmail.htm.
Virginia College of Criminal Defense Attorney’s Calls
for Moratorium
This summer the Virginia College of
Criminal Defense Attorneys became
the second organization of legal professionals
to pass a resolution
calling for a moratorium on the death penalty
in Virginia. Last Spring,
the Charlottesville- Albemarle Bar Association
became the first to pass
such a resolution.
Bruce Williamson, former President of the
Charlottesville- Albemarle
Bar, was one of the lawyers who brought the moratorium
resolution up
before the VCCDA. “One of the main reasons
for VCCDA’s adoption of the
resolution is to promote discussion about the
death penalty and how it
works in Virginia”, said Williamson.
…………..At the same time, the Prince William County
Bar Association killed
a proposed resolution calling for a moratorium.
The resolution was
proposed by John J. Wall, member of the association’s
Board of
Directors. The resolution, modeled after
the American Bar Association’s
resolution passed in 1998, calls for a moratorium
on executions until
the following policies are implemented:
to ensure the death penalty be
administered fairly; to minimize the risk of
innocent people being
executed; to eliminate racially motivated sentencing;
and spare the
mentally retarded and those younger than the
age of 18 at the time of
the offense.
Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Rick Conway
argued the resolution was
a “somewhat veiled attempt” for death penalty
opponents to abolish the
controversial punishment by imposing “unrealistic”
procedures. “If we
wait until there’s an absolutely perfect way
to impose the death
penalty, we’ll never have a death penalty.
I believe the anti-death
penalty strategy has become one of, ‘let’s try
to impose totally
unrealistic and impossible procedures on the
death penalty.’ While
pretending to be neutral, the ABA is supporting
that policy.”
Penny Wakefield, director of the ABA’s section
of individual rights and
responsibilities, said the moratorium would allow
attorneys and judges
time to reevaluate the current justice system.
“This moratorium
resolution has very little to do with whether
there should be a death
penalty and an awful lot to do with what lawyers
should do at any given
day, particularly when a case involves a question
of life and death.”
Sen. Charles Colgan (D-29th), Del. Harry Parrish
(R-50th), and Del.
Michele Mcquigg, (R-51st) were present and all
said they supported the
death penalty.
In related news, VADP kicked off it’s “Moratorium
in Virginia” campaign
at it’s annual conference on October 16.
A strategy session was held on
the wording of the resolution and the model document
is currently being
modified. VADP is calling on all groups
and organizations to consider
presenting such a moratorium to their governing
bodies. Please contact
us for further information.
21- Day Rule Update
Efforts to repeal the 21- Day Rule are alive
and well. As many of you
know, the 21- Day rule prevents any court from
reviewing any new
evidence of innocence 21 days or more after initial
sentencing.
The Capital Case Bill of Review introduced
last year in the General
Assembly by Del. Jim Almand of Arlington which
calls for a repeal of the
rule, passed in the House Courts of Justice Committeee
and lost by 5
votes on a full House vote. Since then
at least 1 Delegate has
regretted voting against it and one Senator has
reconsidered and would
now vote for it. We should not assume
that if your Delegate voted for
it last session that they will vote for it again
this session. It is
very important that you continue to contact your
representative about
the bill.
This summer, the Mid- Atlantic office of Amnesty
International funded
the efforts of high-school graduate Wesley Hottot
as he researched the
origins of the rule, mailed a survey to the 100
members of the House of
Delegates who voted on the Capital Case Bill
of Review last session, and
compiled his findings in a brochure.
The brochure explains the 21- Day Rule,
media reaction, the Capital
Case Bill of Review, results of the survey to
legislators, and a
point-counter point for activists to use when
talking about the rule
with their legislators.
The brochure and multiple copies can be
obtained by contacting VADP.
Wes’ summer project has given us a wonderful
brochure that we can
continue educating the public and our legislators.
Many thanks to Wes
and AIMARO.
As a result of this brochure, the Coalition
to Repeal the 21- Day Rule
has been formed. At our October Conference
Sue Rafferty, legislative
aide to Del. Almand advised us to get as many
groups and organizations
to join this coalition. In June, Virginia’s Half
Year’s Meeting
(Quakers) officially passed a minute supporting
the repeal of the rule.
Other members of the coalition include
the Virginia Interfaith Center
for Public Policy, which sponsored candidate
forums across the state
during the past election, and included a question
to the candidates
about the rule. Also included are, Murder
Victims’ Families for
Reconciliation and Virginia People of Faith for
Alternatives to the
Death Penalty. Please contact us
if your group or organization would
like to be part of this coalition.
1999 Quality of Life Survey Reaffirms Virginians
Prefer an Alternative
For the 7th consecutive year survey results
from the Quality of Life in
Virginia Poll show that Virginians prefer an
alternative to the death
penalty. When surveyors asked 514 respondents
whether they supported the
death penalty, 74 % agreed. This is the
lowest percentage that
responded in favor of the death penalty in the
7 years. For the second
consecutive year nearly 20% opposed the death
penalty which is the
lowest recorded in the 7 years of polling.
But when respondents were asked their views if
there were the
alternative of Life, with no possibility of parole
for a minimum of 25
years combined with restitution to the victims’
family, 54.8% agreed
with the alternative and 40.5 % disagreed.
Copies of the graph can be obtained from VADP.
Virginia Supreme Court Orders New Trial for Lilly
In a 5-2 ruling, the Virginia Supreme Court
last month ordered a
retrial for Benjamin Lilly, who was sentenced
to death for his role in
the abduction and murder of a Virginia Tech student
in 1995.
The same court unanimously upheld the death
sentence in a previous
ruling. But the U.S. Supreme Court ruled earlier
this year that
convicting Ben Lilly on the basis of a statement
made to police by his
brother and co-defendant, Mark Lilly, violated
Ben’s Sixth Amendment
right to confront witnesses against him.
Mark told police his brother
pulled the trigger, but invoked his Fifth Amendment
right against
self-incrimination and refused to testify at
trial. The trial Judge
allowed the statement to be entered into evidence
without Ben’s attorney
getting the opportunity to cross-examine.
As a result, the case went back to the
Virginia Supreme Court and this
time they concurred.
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Terry Williams Appeal
by Dinah Leventhal,
attorney for Terry Williams
The Supreme Court of the United States heard
oral arguments in Terry
Williams’ federal habeas case on October 4, 1999.
Terry was sentenced
to death in 1986 after a trial in which his attorneys
failed to present
a wealth of available mitigating evidence to
the jury. The state judge
who originally sentenced Terry to death, Judge
James Ingram of Danville,
was persuaded at the state habeas hearing, after
hearing all of the
evidence that Terry’s attorneys failed to present
to the jury, that this
evidence would have made a difference to the
jury and thus could have
resulted in a life sentence.
John Gibbons, who argued Terry’s case in the
Supreme Court, explained to
the justices that the members of the Virginia
Supreme Court who reversed
Judge Ingram’s finding were simply wrong.
The key issue in the U.S.
Supreme Court case is how much deference the
federal courts are required
to give to that incorrect ruling. Lawyers
on both sides agree that the
1996 Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty
Act (AEDPA) requires
federal courts to consider the decision of the
highest state court on
state habeas and not just start from scratch
in deciding the prisoner’s
claims of constitutional error. But the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit, in rejecting Terry’s
appeal, has interpreted the
statute to go much further, requiring the federal
court to defer to the
state court’s ruling in almost every instance.
Terry’s case was the very first oral argument
of the 1999 Supreme Court
Term. It was a frank and lively exchange
of views with most of the
justices jumping in frequently with questions
and observations.
Although she had just recently been released
from the hospital following
cancer surgery, Justice Ginsburg was a particularly
active and
well-prepared participant in the proceedings.
A decision in the case
could be made at any time before next summer.
(Editor’s note: Terry also has significant
evidence to prove that he is
innocent of the crime he was condemned to death
for. Note that is not
mentioned in his appeal to the Supreme Court.
That is due to the fact
that appeals courts cannot review issues of innocence.
(21- Day Rule)
Only the Governor can.)
Lonnie Weeks Receives Stay- High Court to Hear Arguments
Dec. 6
Less than 2 hours before Lonnie Weeks
was to be executed on September
1, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the execution
based on the trial
judge’s response to clarification requested by
jurors.
At issue is the following. When jurors
tell the judge they don’t
understand instructions and ask whether they
can consider a sentence
less than death, even if one or more aggravating
factors making the
death sentence an option are found, does the
Constitution require that
the judge clarify that the death sentence is
not mandatory and that
mitigating factors also should be considered?
If the High Court agrees, Lonnie will get
a new sentencing hearing.
Lonnie Weeks has been on Death Row since
January, 1994 for the 1993
murder of State Trooper Jose M. Cavazos on I-95
in Prince William
County. He has never denied killing Trooper
Cavazos.
The slain Trooper’s 2 children had both
contacted Gov. Gilmore to spare
the life of their father’s killer. National
Public Radio aired
interviews with Trevor and Leslie Cavazos in
which they talked about
coming to the point of forgiving Lonnie for what
he had done. Their
mother while she does not share their views,
is very respectful of them.
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Stay to Michael Williams
On October 28, just one hour before
the scheduled execution of Michael
Wayne Williams, the U.S. Supreme Court granted
a stay. Michael has been
on Death Row since 1994 for the 1993 murders
of a Cumberland County
couple.
At issue is that the prosecutor in the
case argued that Williams had an
edge on the other witnesses because, as a defendant,
he could first hear
all the other witnesses’ testimony. His
lawyer, Barbara Hartung of
Richmond, argued his rights were violated when
the prosecutor used the
fact that Williams heard the other witnesses’
testimony to impeach
Williams’ testimony. Ms. Hartung argued
that Williams’ execution should
be stayed until a similar case from N.Y. is heard.
Both Williams and his co-defendant admit
having fired one shot each,
but blame each other for seven othe rshots fired.
Virginia Supreme Court Sends Death Row Prisoner’s
Case Back for
Resentencing
On September 17, a divided Virginia
Supreme Court ruled by a 5-2 margin
that jurors must be told in all capital murder
cases that a life
sentence means life without parole.
After finding Robert Yarbrough guilty of
capital murder for the 1997
murder and robbery of convenience store owner
Cyril Hamby in Mecklenburg
County, the jurors asked the Judge whether Yarbrough
could be released
in as little as 12 years. Nonetheless the Judge
told the jury that
consistent with earlier state Supreme Court opinions,
they were not to
concern themselves with what happened after they
returned their
verdict. The jury then recommended death.
Since 1995, when parole was
abolished in Virginia, a life sentence has meant
exactly that.
Convicted Triggerman in 1996 Slaying Sentenced Again
to Death
For the second time, a man convicted
of the abduction, robbery and
murder of a Langley Air Force Base airman has
been sentenced to death.
Circuit Judge Prentis Smiley pronounced the sentence
October 26 on Daryl R. Atkins, 21, who was tried
and sentenced
originally in 1998. The Virginia Supreme Court
threw out the first
sentence because of a procedural problem with
a verdict form given to
the jury.
Atkins and co-defendant William Alfredic Jones abducted
21-year-old Airman 1st Class Eric Nesbitt outside
a Hampton convenience
store in August 1996, forced Nesbitt to withdraw
money from an automatic
teller machine and then drove him to a
desolate road, where Nesbitt was shot eight times.
Prosecutors said Atkins was the triggerman. A plea
agreement was reached with Jones, who testified
against Atkins.
Dead Run- The Untold Story of Dennis Stockton
and the 1984 Mass Escape
from Virginia’s Death Row
This just released book by Virginia
Pilot Editor Bill Burke and
reporter Joe Jackson is the latest in true stories
about Virginia’s
criminal justice system and the death penalty.
Dennis Stockton, executed on September
27, 1995, spent 12 years on
death row for a crime, evidence shows he did
not commit. Unbelievably,
neither the Courts nor Gov. George Allen would
listen to hard evidence,
including the confessions of another person,
showing
that the murder was
not committed by Dennis.
While incarcerated, Dennis used writing
as an outlet to cope with the
senseless violence of prison life. In his
diary, parts published by the
Virginia Pilot, he recorded details of the sensational
escape from
Virginia’s Death Row in 1984 where 6 prisoner’s
escaped from Virginia’s
“escape-proof” Death Row. Although he helped
in the planning, he
declined to go along, preferring to take his
chances with his appeals.
He writes about the power struggles among
inmates, between inmates and
prison officials, and the corruption of guards
who were involved with
drug dealing and other illegal activities.
His account of prison life,
the escape, and his own experience leading up
to his execution is
riveting.
Bill Burke and Joe Jackson use Dennis’
case and his accounts to examine
the U.S. criminal justice and prison systems
and the grisly practice of
executions.
VADP has purchased multiple copies of this book
and is offering it for a
donation of $17.
Bud Welch Speaks in Charlottesville
by Terri Powers
Everyone has a story. Some amuse, others are sad. Others
- the powerful ones - have the ability to reach us and teach us.
They rearrange our thoughts and challenge our deepest convictions.
Recently, parishioners at the Church of the Incarnation in Charlottesville
heard such a story. Bud Welch, who lost his only daughter in the
Oklahoma City bombing, shared his story with us.
An ordinary man with an extraordinary response to a horrifying and
life-altering loss, Bud explained that he grew up on a dairy farm
in Oklahoma. He owned a Texaco service station in Oklahoma City and
was busy raising his family, two sons and a daughter, Julie Marie.
We came to know Julie Marie as Bud shared his special memories with
us - her deep faith in God, her compassion for others and her adventurous
spirit. We laughed with Bud as he recounted her first day at college,
with Julie trying so hard to be “totally cool.” We learned of her
dedication to learning, her gift with languages (earning her a college
scholarship) and her desire to help others which led her to the Dominican
Republic on a service project. Julie’s first job, after college,
was working as an interpreter for the Social Security Administration.
She was dating a very special young man, attending daily Mass, and life
was full and wonderful.
The explosion at the Federal Building changed all that. Bud’s
23-year-old daughter was dead. This gifted and loving daughter, in
whom he took such pride and delight, was gone forever.
This man of faith was filled with hatred and the desire for revenge.
“I know now why prisoners charged with murder wear bullet proof vests,”
Bud said. “I would have killed Timothy McVeigh. I wanted him
dead.”
The awful months went by with no relief. Visiting the bomb area
became a ritual for Bud. It was there that he first began to realize that
Timothy McVeigh’s death would not really change a thing — it would not
bring Julie Marie back. Slowly Bud changed. He recalled Julie
Marie’s opposition to the death penalty. “It only teaches people
to hate” she had said. By the time McVeigh went on trial, Bud was
there pleading for life imprisonment - not the death penalty - for the
man responsible for Julie Marie’s life.
Of course, there is more to Bud’s story - much more. And what
he shared with us at Incarnation had the most incredible impact.
He truly touched peoples’ hearts and minds. Folks who had been for
the death penalty were heard to tell Bud, “You really made me rethink my
position. I’ll never be able to support the death penalty again.”
Did he change everyone? Certainly not, but no one left that church without
being challenged in a new and personal way. Without sermonizing,
without judgement, without pointing fingers, Bud’s story made an enormous
difference and will have long lasting impact.
As Bud said, “Would Jesus give that lethal injection?”
Charlottesville Group Conducts Listening Project
by Michele Mattioli
On Saturday morning, November 13, 12 people gathered
at the Quaker
meeting house in Charlottesville for a Listening
Project on the death
penalty. During the morning the group explored
what can be accomplished
with a Listening Project and how to be an
active listener (not an easy skill in our culture.)
The group reviewed
the survey questions that the Quaker Peace and
Social Concerns Committee
adapted from the VADP Listening Project with
legislators. Trainers
modeled the questionnaire process and then pairs
of listeners practiced
the technique.
After lunch the pairs went into the community
for three hours of going
door to door listening to what folks think and
feel about the death
penalty. A variety of neighborhoods were canvassed:
a working class
African-American neighborhood, a middle to upper
income white
subdivision in Albemarle County, a public housing
project, two downtown
neighborhoods, and the University area.
Of 32 in-depth interviews
(several folks said they didn't have time to
talk, but then gave their
views without answering the specific survey questions)
twenty people
opposed the death penalty and twelve were in
favor. No one interviewed
had heard of the 21 day rule, but when told about
it, all disagreed with
it, even those who favored the death penalty.
All but one person
accepted literature when asked at the end of
the interview if they would
like more information. As anticipated, listeners
and speakers alike
gained a great deal of insight and clarified
their positions on the many
aspects of this complex issue.
(Michele can be contacted at (804) 984-4655 or
mattioli@virginia-organizing.org)
110 at Greensville
Activists from around the state gathered at
the Greensville Correctional Center for "Fill the Field," the vigil for
Thomas Royal Jr, and Officer Kenneth Wallace on November 9.
"Fill the Field" is an annual attempt to draw
a large crowd to the state's extermination site on the night of an execution.
Many local vigils either cancel or scale down for the evening.
This year 110 people gathered, an increase over
the 75 participants from 1998. Dozens of people attended their first vigil
on this evening.
A highlight was the participation of Bud Welch,
who extended his Virginia visit so that he could attend the vigil. Welch's
inspiration thoughts captivated the crowd (not to mention the fact that
he wore a VADP "Eye for an Eye" shirt).
A standard feature of the Greensville vigil is
the litany of the men executed and their victims. For "Fill the Field"
the names were printed on individual cards, and passed around the circle.
Many people felt that this was particularly moving.
Three or four people gave prayers during the
"open mike" portion of the evening, including a representative from a large
contingent from Old Dominion University.
The evening concluded with a candlelight witnessing
at the side of the road as the witness vans and, later, the hearse bearing
the body of Thomas Royal headed for Richmond.
The legacy of "Fill the Field 1999" is that several
new activists have joined us because their experience in Jarratt.
Pen Pals
by Linda Clare-Stanton
Last
year we initiated the Pen Pal site for the men on
Virginia’s Death Row. We asked each inmate if
he wanted to have personal
information shared on the Internet. Approximately
twelve to fifteen men
responded. Their names and information can be
found on our web site.
This past summer I wrote again to each of the
men on the Row. I asked if
they wanted to change any information that they
had provided, or if they
had any problems or concerns that needed to be
addressed regarding the
site. I received numerous
letters back speaking positively about the relationships
that had been
developed through the Pen Pal program. A few
more men added themselves
to the list as well.
The
“program” as such, is not monitored. Who you write, when you
write, what you write is up to you. The men who
have placed their
information on the site are simply letting us
know that they are
receptive to the idea of making new friends.
Who they write, when they
write, and what they write is up to them.
Clear
communication from the beginning will go a long way in
helping you establish a good relationship with
your pen pal. Try not to
over extend yourself or promise to do things
you can’t do. If the
prisoner goes into areas that are uncomfortable
for you, say so.
Otherwise, your discomfort may cause you to leave.
If you do need to
stop the pen pal relationship please communicate
with the prisoner that
you are doing so.
You
may never see his face or actually hear his voice, but he’s
human... quite human. If you can treat him as
such you might find
yourself in the middle of quite an interesting
friendship.
The
following is a poem I wrote in April of 1998, six months
into writing my first pen pal... whom I still
write.
Death Row was once just a place to me
Where
society left its troubles,
For no one to see...
A place of personal tragedy
No
good to be found, only misery
Death Row was where hatred dwelled
In
murderous hearts,
Condemned to hell...
A place I imagined where time stood still
No
future, no dreams, for those who had killed.
Until one day when I looked in
And
found looking back, the eyes of a friend
A man with a heart
And
a mind to match mine.
A poet, and artist, a lover of life
A man who once led a life of crime
Death Row now has a face and a name,
A
voice to point out Society’s shame
That we throw away people
And
never look back
To see if just one might get back on track
That we don’t step in; let love work its way
Into
souls that need healing
And hearts that need faith.
Linda Clare-Stanton
Upcoming Events
Wednesday January 26: Sr. Helen Prejean
at University of Richmond’s
Jepson School.
Thursday January 27: Virginia Death Penalty Awareness
Day with special
guest Sr. Helen Prejean. 11 AM. The Capitol.
Evening with Sr. Helen. Charlottesville.
Saturday April 8: VADP Spring Conference,
First Unitarian Church, Richmond (very tentative at this time).
|